Determine the accuracy of the statements by marking them as True (T), False (F), or Not Stated (NS). The Argument Their

suggested getting a cat. Louisa"s friends thought a hamster would be a great pet, while her neighbor recommended a rabbit.

Both Louisa and Duncan presented their arguments to their parents. Louisa argued that a hamster would be the perfect pet because it requires less space and is easier to take care of compared to a dog or cat. Duncan, on the other hand, believed that a cat would be the best choice because they are more independent and can provide great companionship.

After hearing both arguments, the parents took some time to consider their options. They weighed the pros and cons of each pet and also took into account the responsibilities and commitments that come with owning a pet. Eventually, they made a decision and presented it to the twins.

Based on the given information, we can determine the accuracy of the statements as follows:

1. Their parents had promised the twins a pet for their twelfth birthdays.
True (T) - This statement is explicitly mentioned in the argument.

2. The only condition was that it had to be a single pet.
True (T) - This condition is stated in the argument.

3. Duncan"s best friend suggested getting a dog.
Not Stated (NS) - Although it is mentioned that Duncan"s best friend suggested getting a pet, the specific suggestion of a dog is not mentioned.

4. Louisa"s friends thought a hamster would be a great pet.
Not Stated (NS) - While it is mentioned that Louisa"s friends recommended a pet, the specific recommendation of a hamster is not stated.

5. The parents made a decision and presented it to the twins.
Not Stated (NS) - The final decision made by the parents is not mentioned in the argument. It is unclear whether a decision was reached and presented to the twins.

Therefore, based on the given information, statements 1 and 2 are true, while statements 3, 4, and 5 are not stated.